首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们在线留言
 
太平洋潮波特征比较
作者:沈春1  左军成2  张建立3  朱春琳1 
单位:1. 解放军理工大学气象学院 南京 211101;
2. 南京河海大学 南京 210098;
3. 国家海洋信息中心 天津 300171
关键词:TOPEX/Poseidon卫星 大洋潮波模式 调和常数 太平洋 
分类号:P731
出版年·卷·期(页码):2008·25·第二期(42-50)
摘要:
本文对TOPEX/Poseidon高度计资料直接分析得到4个主要分潮(M2、K1、S2和O1)的调和常数,将其与全球大洋潮波模式TPXO6.2的模拟结果以及太平洋中48个验潮站观测资料的分析结果进行了系统比较,得出高度计资料直接分析结果与潮波模式模拟结果总体比较一致。模拟出的无潮点的位置和高度计资料直接分析结果有差异,且K1和O1分潮差异较大。与站点结果比较表明TPXO6.2模式模拟结果与验潮站观测结果的振幅绝对偏差小于2cm的站点的百分比达到85%,迟角绝对偏差小于40°的站点的百分比达到70%以上,比高度计资料直接分析结果精确;矢量均方根误差比较表明,太平洋中部结果比整个太平洋结果准确,太平洋矢量均方根误差的值和其他研究者、其他模式的结果近似。
The harmonic constants of the four dominant constituents M2,K1,S2 and O1 obtained from the analysis of TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter data are compared with the simulation results of global ocean tide model TPXO6.2 and observation of 48 tide gauge in the Pacific Ocean.It is suggested that the result of the data analysis basically agrees with that of model simulation but the position of the tide-free points of the results of the analysis altimeter data and the TPXO6.2 model are not match very well.85% of the distribution of the amplitude absolute difference is less than 2cm and 70% of the distribution of the phase lag absolute difference is less than 40°.It is showed from the vector rms that the result of harmonic constants is better in the middle of the Pacific than in the whole Pacific Ocean.When the vector rms of the stations in the Pacific Ocean compared with the vector rms from other models,it is found that the results are quite near.
参考文献:
[1] Schwiderski E W.Ocean tides.Global ocean tidal equations[J].Mar Geod,1980,3:161~217.
[2] Schwiderski E W.Ocean tides.A hydrodynamical interpolations model[J].Mar Geod,1980,3:218~257.
[3] Cartwright D E,Ray R D.Oceanic tides from Geosat altimetry[J].J Geophys Res,1990,95:3069~3090.
[4] Cartwright D E,Ray R D.Energitics of global ocean tides fom Geosat altimetry[J].J Geophys Res,1991,96:16897~16912.
[5] Teague W J,Pister P,Jacobs G A,et al.Evaluation of Tides from TOPEX/POSEIDON in Bohai and Yellow Sea[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,1999,17:679~687.
[6] Shum C K,Woodworth P L,Andersen O B,et al.Accuracy assessment of recent ocean tide models[J].J Geophys Res,1997,102(11):25173~22194.
[7] Egbert G D,S Y Erofeeva.Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides[J].J Atmos Oceanic Technol,2002,19(2):183~204.
[8] 杨学胜,王军,陈谊.从初始化中排除潮汐信号方案在全球模式中的应用[J].热带气象学报,2004,20(2):145~150.
[9] 李立,吴日升,李燕初,等.Topex/POSEIDON高度计浅海潮汐混淆的初步分析[J].海洋学报,1999,21(2):7~14.
[10] Foreman M G G.Manual for tidal analysis and prediction (Pacific Marine Science Report 77-10)[A].Institute of Ocean Sciences Patricia Bay Sidney,B C,1996,58.
[11] 陈宗镛.潮汐学[M].北京:科学出版社,1980,41~43.
[12] Egbert G D,Erofeea S Y.Efficient inverse modelling of barotropic ocean tide[J].J Atmos.Oceanic Technol,2002,19(2):183~204.
[13] Provost C Le,Genco M L,Lyard F.Vincent P,P Canceil.Spectoscopy of the world ocean tides from a finite element hudrodynamic model[J].J Geophys Res,1994,99(12):24777~24797.
[14] 沈春,左军成,杜凌,等.世界大洋潮波特征的比较分析[J].中国海洋大学学报,2006,36(4):523~529.
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
 
 海洋预报编辑部 地址:北京海淀大慧寺路8号
电话:010-62105776
投稿网址:http://www.hyyb.org.cn
邮箱:bjb@nmefc.cn