ECMWF和GFS模式对一例温带气旋预报性能的对比分析-海洋预报

ECMWF和GFS模式对一例温带气旋预报性能的对比分析

单位：中国卫星海上测控部, 江苏江阴 214431

分类号：P443

出版年·卷·期（页码）：2014·31·第一期（22-29）

摘要：

利用ECMWF(欧洲中期天气预报中心)的确定性、集合(平均值和标准差)预报产品和NCEP/GFS(美国国家环境预报中心/全球预报系统)的确定性预报产品,对比分析了它们对西南太平洋一例中α尺度温带气旋的预报性能,结果表明:GFS10—7天前的形势预报较差,6—4天的形势预报较好,但对气旋的强度和位置预报较差;ECMWF确定性模式对该气旋的中期形势预报较GFS模式稳定,两家模式短期形势预报都很准确;ECMWF集合(平均)预报的中期形势较确定性预报更稳定,对天气系统位相的预报更准确,但强度预报偏弱,其标准差场可以定性评估形势场预报的准确性;上述三类产品的综合预报可以有效改善NMWW3(多重网格WAVEWATCH Ⅲ)模式海浪中期形势和短期要素预报。

By using ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts) ensemble prediction products (mean and standard deviation) and NCEP/GFS (National Center for Environmental Prediction/Global Forecast System) deterministic forecast products, the forecasting performance for a case of alpha meso-scale extra-tropical cyclone in the Southwest Pacific was comparatively analyzed. The results are shown as follows: (1) GFS provides poor situation forecasting for 10-7 day, poor intensity and position forecasting for 6-4 day, while does better in 6-4 day situation forecasting; (2) as for the medium-range situation prediction for the cyclone, ECMWF deterministic model is more stable than GFS, and the short-range situation predictions of the two models are both accurate; (3) the medium-range situation perdition of EC-ENS(ECMWF ensemble (mean) is more stable than its deterministic model, and the forecast phase for weather systems is more accurate, but the forecast intensity of all systems is weaker, the accuracy of situation prediction can be qualitatively evaluated by the standard deviation field of EC-ENS; (4) the medium-range wave situation and short-term element forecast of NMWW3 (NOAA Multi-grid WAVEWATCH Ⅲ) can be improved significantly through using subjective synthesis prediction of the numerical prediction products mentioned above.

参考文献：

[1] 蔡芗宁.2011 年3－5 月T639、ECMWF及日本模式中期预报性能检验[J].气象, 2011, 37(8): 1026-1030.
[2] 周宁芳.2010 年9－11 月T639、ECMWF及日本模式中期预报性能检验[J].气象, 2011, 37(2): 237-241.
[3] 涂小萍.基于ECMWF海平面气压场的热带气旋路径预报效果检验[J].气象, 2010, 36(3): 107-111.
[4] 涂小萍,姚日升. ECMWF数值产品在热带气旋(TC)路径预报中的应用分析[J]. 热带气象学报, 2010, 26(6): 759-764.
[5] 陈静, 陈德辉, 颜容. 集合数值预报发展与研究进展[J]. 应用气象学报, 2002, 13(4): 497-507.
[6] Molteni F, Buizza R, Palmer T N,et al.The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: Methodology and verification[J].Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1996, 122: 73-119.
[7] Buizza R, Miller M, Palmer T N.Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF EPS[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1999, 125(560): 2887-2908.
[8] Buizza R.Potential forecast skill of ensemble prediction and spread skill distribution of the ECMWF ensemble prediction system[J].MonthlyWeather Review, 1997, 125(1): 99-119.
[9] Tolman H L.User manual and system documentation of WAVE WATCH-Ⅲ version 3.14[M].Technical Note. 2009.
[10] 伍荣生, 等. 现代天气学原理[M]. 高等教育出版社, 北京, 1999:152.
[11] 杜钧. 集合预报的现状和前景[J]. 应用气象学报,2002,13 (1):16-28.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏】